Aerial view of a public park layout with paths and seating areas

A course in urban observation

Public space is behavioral design for

This course looks closely at plazas, parks, and pedestrian streets across dozens of cities to ask a simple question: why do some spaces fill with people while others, built with similar intentions, stay quiet. The answers are rarely about budget.

View the curriculum
People gathered informally across a sunlit city plaza with mixed seating
A wide, mostly empty concrete plaza with a few scattered figures
Why this course exists

Good intentions do not guarantee a good square.

Many public spaces are designed with genuine care and still end up underused. Others, built cheaply and almost as an afterthought, become the busiest corners of a city. This gap between intention and outcome is where the course spends most of its time. Rather than offering a checklist, it walks through recorded observation, mapping exercises, and comparative footage from cities that took different approaches to the same basic problem: how do you make people want to stay somewhere.

The material draws on decades of public life research, but it is presented for people who have never studied urban design formally. If you have ever wondered why one bench is always taken while another sits empty a few metres away, this course was built with that question in mind.

How the course works

Three stages, one method repeated across many cities

01

Observe

Each module opens with unedited field footage: a plaza at 8am, the same plaza at 6pm, a park on a weekday versus a weekend. You watch before you read any interpretation, so your own eye develops alongside the theory.

02

Analyze

You learn the frameworks researchers actually use: sun and shade mapping, sightline diagrams, edge condition studies, and the twenty-minute rule for informal seating. These are applied to the footage you already watched.

03

Apply

The final stage asks you to study a public space near where you live using the same method, note what you observe, and share it in the course discussion for comparison against other students' local spaces.

Course topics

Four categories of public space, examined on their own terms

Plazas, parks, and pedestrian streets behave differently and reward different questions. The course keeps them separate for most of the term before comparing them directly.

Plazas: open space without an obvious purpose

A plaza has no built-in activity of its own; it succeeds or fails on the strength of its edges, seating, and sun exposure. We compare hardscape squares that stay busy through the day with visually similar ones that empty out after lunch, and look closely at why.

  • Edge conditions and the shops or entrances that face onto the square
  • Movable seating versus fixed benches and what each does to dwell time
  • Sun paths across seasons and their effect on where people actually sit
Cafe tables and chairs arranged along a lively plaza edge with pedestrians passing

Parks: programmed nature and negotiated access

Parks bring their own complications: paths that cut corners, maintenance budgets that shape which areas stay usable, and the tension between quiet retreat and active recreation. This module looks at neighbourhood parks alongside larger civic ones.

  • Desire-path formation and what it reveals about original path design
  • Programming choices that draw different age groups at different hours
  • Sightlines, lighting, and their relationship to perceived safety after dark
People sitting on park benches under trees in dappled afternoon light

Pedestrian zones: flow, friction, and commerce

Streets closed to cars behave differently from plazas because people are usually moving through rather than settling in. We examine how retail frontage, street furniture, and event programming change a through-route into a destination, and where that shift fails to happen.

  • Walking speed and window-shopping behaviour on different street widths
  • Where seating helps a pedestrian street and where it simply blocks flow
  • Evening versus daytime character on the same stretch of pavement
A pedestrian shopping street in the evening with warm lighting and walking crowds

Case studies: direct comparison across cities

The final block pairs spaces from different cities that were designed with similar ambitions but reached different outcomes. Rather than declaring a winner, the material walks through the specific conditions, budgets, and decisions that produced the difference.

  • Two civic squares built within the same decade, compared over a full year
  • A pedestrianised street that thrived next to one that was later reopened to traffic
  • Notes on what changed after small, low-cost interventions in each case
A waterfront promenade with pedestrians walking and cycling along the water's edge
Where to start

A look at the course structure

See full curriculum
A person annotating a printed map of a public square with notes
Module 2

Plazas: Thresholds and Edges

Why the buildings and businesses surrounding a plaza often matter more than the plaza itself.

Explore module
An instructor discussing a city map with a small group of students
Module 4

Pedestrian Zones in Practice

A closer look at conversion projects, from planning through to the first year of use.

Explore module

Curious how your own neighbourhood square measures up?

Read through the full course outline, browse the recommended reading list, or get in touch with a question about the material. There is no pressure to enrol before you know what the course actually covers.